DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/issn.2454-5929.ijohns20193861

A retrospective study on middle ear risk indices in analysing the postoperative outcome following tympanoplasty

P. Vignadutt, Ali Shaik

Abstract


Background: Otitis media is an important and a highly prevalent disease of the middle ear and poses serious health problem worldwide especially in developing countries where large percentage of the population lack specialized medical care. A normally functioning eustachian tube is an equally essential physiologic requirement for a healthy middle ear and normal hearing. In this study we have used the middle ear risk index (MERI) developed by Kartush which generates a numeric indicator of the severity of the middle ear disease to stratify patient groups according to the severity of the disease and to evaluate the efficiency of MERI score in predicting the outcome of tympanoplasty.

Methods: Patients who came and got operated for tympanoplasty to the ENT Department in Konaseema Institute of Medical Sciences and RF, Amalapuram during the study period of February 2017 to February 2018.  

Results: In this study graft was accepted in 22 patients (88%) and rejected in 3 (12%) patients. In patients in the mild MERI risk group n=22, graft was accepted in 21 (95%) patients and rejected in 1 patient (5%). Patient had a residual perforation. In patients in the moderate MERI risk group n=2, graft was accepted in 1 (50%) patients and rejected in 1 patient (50%).In severe risk group none of the grafts were accepted (100%).

Conclusions: MERI index is in fact a very useful and honest predictor of the graft uptake and audiological gain in patients undergoing tympanoplasty surgeries for CSOM. Lower the MERI index better the outcome. Positive Belluci criteria were also found to be inversely associated with the graft uptake.


Keywords


Middle ear risk index, Postoperative outcome, Tympanoplasty

Full Text:

PDF

References


Merchant SN, Wang PC, Jang CH, Glynn RJ, Rauch SD, McKenna MJ, et al. Efficacy of tympano-mastoid surgery for control of infection in active COM. Laryngoscope. 1997;107:872-7.

Tos M. Late Results in Tympanoplasty. Staging the operation. Acta Oto-La-ryngologica. 1976;82(1):282-5.

Hirsch BE, Kamerer DB, Doshi S. Single Stage Management of Cholesteatoma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1992;106(4):351-4.

Sheehy JL, Crabtree JA. Tympanoplasty. Staging the Operation. Laryngoscope. 1973;83(10):1594-621.

Shelton C, Sheehy JL. Tympanoplasty: Review of 400 Staged Cases. Laryngoscope. 1990;100(7):679-81.

Black B. Ossiculoplasty prognosis: the spite method of assessment. Am J Otol. 1992;13:544-51.

Albu S, Babighian G, Trabalzini F. Prognostic factors in tympanoplasty. The American Journal of otology. 1998;19:136-40.

Brackman DE, Sheehy JL, Luxford WM. TORPs and PORPs in tympanoplasty: a review of 1042 operations. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1984;92:32-37.

Kartush JM. Ossicular chain reconstruction. Capitu-lum to Malleus. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1994;27(4):689-715.

Wasson JD, Papadimitriou CE, Pau H. Myringoplasty: impact of perforation size on closure and audiological improvement. J Laryngol Otol. 2009;123:973-977.

Pignataro L, Berta LGD, Capaccio P, Zaghis A. Myringoplasty in children: anatomical and functional results. J Laryngol Otol. 2001;115:369-73.

Holmquist I. The role of eustachian tube in the myringoplasty. Acta Otolaryngol (stockh). 1968;66:289.

Lima JCBD, Marone SAM, Martucci O, Gonçalez F, Silva Neto JJD, Ramos ACM. Evaluation of the organic and functional results of tympanoplasties through a retro-auricular approach at a medical residency unit. Brazilian J Otorhinolaryngol. 2011;77(2):229–36.

Sharma A, Saxena R, Verma L, Bhandari S. Correlation Between MERI and Hearing After Tympanoplasty. J Nepalgunj Med Coll. 2017;13(2):6-9.

Ahmed I, Ghafoor T, Samore NA, Chattha MN. Down syndrome: clinical and cytogenetic analysis. J Coll Phys Surgeon-Pak. PMID:16197873.

Kumar N, Madkikar NN, Kishve S, Chilke D, Shinde KJ. Using Middle Ear Risk Index and ET Function as Parameters for Predicting the Outcome of Tympanoplasty. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;64(1):13-16.

Pinar E, Sadullahoglu K, Calli C, Oncel S. Evaluation of prognostic factors and middle ear risk index in tympanoplasty. Otolaryngology-Head Neck Surg. 2008;139(3):386–90.

Naderpour M, Jabbari Moghadam Y, Ghanbarpour E, Shahidi N. Evaluation of Factors Affecting the Surgical Outcome in Tympanoplasty. Iranian J Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;28(85):99-104.

Becvarovski Z, Kartush JM. Smoking and tympanoplasty: implications for prognosis and the Middle Ear Risk Index (MERI). Laryngoscope. 2001;111(10):1806–11.