DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/issn.2454-5929.ijohns20192554

Tympanoplasty with and without cortical mastoidectomy in treatment of inactive mucosal chronic otitis media

Divya Aggarwal, Sandeep Vemu, Sunil Kapur

Abstract


Background: Tympano-mastoidectomy has been found to be an effective method of treatment of chronic ear infection, but the effect of mastoidectomy on patients without evidence of active infectious disease in mastoid remains highly debated and unproven. Analyse the surgical outcomes of repair of uncomplicated tympanic membrane perforations with tympanoplasty alone and tympanoplasty combined with mastoidectomy.

Methods: The present study was a prospective, comparative, randomized controlled trial in which 60 patients 30 in each groups via simple random sampling technique underwent tympanoplasty with cortical mastoidectomy. Temporalis fascia was used as graft in all the cases. All the surgeries were done by post aural route and underlay technique was used in all cases.  

Results: The overall graft uptake rate in our study was 88.33%. The graft uptake rate in tympanoplasty group was 87% and 90% in the tympanoplasty with cortical mastoidectomy group. There was no significant difference in the graft uptake rates of the two groups. There was no statistical significance between the two groups as p>0.05, suggesting that mastoidectomy when combined with tympanoplasty offers no benefit over tympanoplasty alone. There was no significant difference in hearing gain between the two groups as p value obtained was >0.05.

Conclusions: Tympanoplasty alone is sufficient in patients with chronic inactive mucosal otitis media, as the results of the graft uptake and hearing improvement show no significant difference between the tympanoplasty group and the tympanoplasty with cortical mastoidectomy group.


Keywords


Tympanoplasty, Cortical mastoidectomy, Chronic otitis media

Full Text:

PDF

References


Singh M, Rai A, Bandyopadhyay S. Middle ear microsurgery in India: A retrospective audit study. Ind J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006;58:133-6.

Ruhl CM, Pensak ML. Role of aerating mastoidectomy in noncholesteatomatous chronic otitis media. Laryngoscope. 1999;109:1924–7.

Kamath MP, Suja S, Raghavendra R, Vinay R, Krishnam R. Success of myringoplasty: Our experience. Ind J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;65(4):358–62.

Holmquist J, Bergstrom B. The mastoid air cell system in ear surgery. Arch Otolaryngol. 1978;104:127–9.

Ramakrishnan A, Panda NK, Mohindra S, Munjal S. Cortical mastoidectomy in surgery of tubotympanic disease. Are we overdoing it? Surgeon. 2011;9:22-6.

Habib MA, Huq MZ, Aktaruzzaman M, Alam MS, Joarder AH, Hussain MA. Outcome of tympanoplsty with and without cortical mastoidectomy for tubotymapanic chronic otits media. Mymensingh Med J. 2011;20:478-83.

Bhat KV, Naseeruddin K, Nagalotimath US, Kumar PR, Hegde JS. Cortical mastoidectomy in quiescent tubotympanic otitis media: is it routinely necessary? J Laryngol Otol. 2009;123:383-90.

Albu S, Trabalzini F, Amadori M. Usefulness of cortical mastoidectomy in myringoplasty. Otol Neurotol. 2012;33:604-9.

Toroz SZ, Habesoglu TE, Habesoglu M, Bolukbasi S, Naiboglu B, Karaca CT, et al. Do patients with sclerotic mastoids require aeration to improve success of tympanoplasty? Acta Otolayngol. 2010;130:909-12.

Lee P, Kelly G, Mills RP. Myringoplasty: does the size of perforation matter? Clin Otol All Sci. 2002;27:331-4.

McGrew BM, Jackson G, Glascock ME. Impact of mastoidectomy on simple tympanic membrane perforation repair. Laryngoscope. 2004;114:506–11.

Nayak DR, Balakrishnan R, Hazarika P, Matthew PT. Role of cortical mastoidectomy in the results of myringoplasty for dry tubotympanic disease. Ind J Otol. 2003;9:11-5.

Krishnan A, Reddy EEK, Chandrakiran C, Nalinesha KM, Jagannath PM. Tympanoplasty with and without cortical mastoidectomy- a comparative study. In J Otol Head Neck Surg. 2002;54(3):195-8.