DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/issn.2454-5929.ijohns20203990

Correlation between microscopic and endoscopic approach to tympanoplasty: a comparative study

Jitendra Rathod, Reena Vare, Annju Thomas

Abstract


Background: The objective of the study was to evaluate the role of endoscopes in the management of dry central perforations of the tympanic membrane, compare the visualization of middle ear anatomy, time taken for the procedure and each step of the surgery and preoperative and postoperative hearing results/improvement.

Methods: Fifty patients of chronic suppurative otitis media without cholesteatoma who came to ENT OPD at MGM medical college and hospital Aurangabad were included. They were divided into 2 groups with 25 patients each. Group A underwent microscopic approach to tympanoplasty and group b underwent endoscopic approach to tympanoplasty. Patients were assessed pre and postoperatively after 7 days, 14 days, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months with postoperative audiometry in the third month.

Results: There was an improvement in the post-operative audiometry air bone gap (ABG) in both the groups. The operative time for group A was comparatively lesser than group B. Residual perforation were detected in one patient in group A at postoperative months 3 and 6, and for group B at postoperative month 3 and in two patients at postoperative month 6.

Conclusions: A shorter operative duration is an advantage of microscopic tympanoplasty technique. One handed technique is one of the disadvantages of endoscope. The endoscopic approach gave better results in terms of easy visualization of the entire tympanic membrane and ossicular system. Tympanoplasty using endoscope was found to be an effective method for management of dry central perforations of the tympanic membrane.


Keywords


Microscopic, Endoscopic, Tympanoplasty

Full Text:

PDF

References


Dhingra PL. Cholesteatoma and chronic suppurative otitis media. In: Diseases of the ear, nose and throat. 6th ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2014:68.

Dhingra PL. Mastoid surgeries. In: Diseases of the ear, nose and throat. Diseases of the ear, nose and throat. 6th ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2014:356.

Zollner F. The principles of plastic surgery of the sound-conducting apparatus. J Laryngol Otol. 1955;69(10):637-52.

Dornhoffer JL. Hearing results with cartilage tympanoplasty. Laryngoscope. 1997;107(8):1094-9.

Choi N, Yangseop N, Woori P, Jung JL, Sunhyun Y, Ji EC, et al. Comparison of endoscopic tympanoplasty to microscopic tympanoplasty. Clincal and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology. 2017;10(1):44-9.

Thomassin JM, Duchon-Doris JM, Emram B, Rud C, Conciatori J, Viloq P. Endoscopic ear surgery: initial evaluation. Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac. 1990;107(8):564-70.

Marchioni D, Alicandri-Ciufelli M, Piccinni A, Genovese E, Presutti L. Inferior retrotympanum revisited: an endoscopic anatomic study. Laryngoscope. 2010;120(9):1880-6.

Ayache S, Tramier B, Strunski V. Otoendoscopy in cholesteatoma surgery of the middle ear: what benefits can be expected?. Otol Neurotol. 2008;29(8):1085-90.

Migirov L, Shapira Y, Horowitz Z, Wolf M. Exclusive endoscopic ear surgery for acquired cholesteatoma: preliminary results. Otol Neurotol. 2011;32(3):433-6.

Thomassin JM, Korchia D, Doris JM. Endoscopic-guided otosurgery in the prevention of residual cholesteatomas. Laryngoscope. 1993;103(8):939-43.

Good GM, Isaacson G. Otoendoscopy for improved pediatric cholesteatoma removal. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1999;108(9):893-6.

Presutti L, Marchioni D, Mattioli F, Villari D, Matteo AC. Endoscopic management of acquired cholesteatoma: our experience. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;37(4):481-7.

Badr-el-Dine M. Value of ear endoscopy in cholesteatoma surgery. Otol Neurotol. 2002;23(5):631-5.

Tarabichi M. Endoscopic management of limited attic cholesteatoma. Laryngoscope. 2004;114(7):1157-62.

Marchioni D, Mattioli F, Matteo AC, Presutti L. Endoscopic approach to tensor fold in patients with attic cholesteatoma. Acta Otolaryngol. 2009;129(9):946-54.

Tarabichi M. Transcanal endoscopic management of cholesteatoma. Otol Neurotol. 2010;31(4):580-8.

Marchioni D, Villari D, Matteo AC, Piccinini A, Presutti L. Endoscopic open technique in patients with middle ear cholesteatoma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2011;268(11):1557-63.

Presutti L, Gioacchini FM, Matteo AC, Villari D, Marchioni D. Results of endoscopic middle ear surgery for cholesteatoma treatment: a systematic review. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2014;34(3):153-7.

Dundar R, Kulduk E, Soy FK, Aslan M, Hanci D, Muluk NB. Endoscopic versus microscopic approach to type 1 tympanoplasty in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;78(7):1084-9.

Kozin ED, Gulati S, Kaplan AB, Lehmann AE, Remenschneider AK, Landegger LD. Systematic review of outcomes following observational and operative endoscopic middle ear surgery. Laryngoscope. 2015;125(5):1205-14.

Bottrill I, Perrault DF, Poe D. In vitro and in vivo determination of the thermal effect of middle ear endoscopy. Laryngoscope. 1996;106(2):213-6.

Ahmed A, Alam S, Hashmi SF, Hasan SA. A Prospective study comparing the results of endoscope assisted versus microscope assisted myringoplasty. Global Journal of Otolaryngology. 2016;1(4):5-9.

Sinha M, Hirani N, Khilnani AK. Comparison of endoscopic underlay and microscopic underlay tympanoplasty: a prospective research at a tertiary care centre in Gujarat. International Journal of otorhinolaryngology and Head and neck surgery. 2017;3(4):9-15.

Shoeb M, Gite V, Samir B, Shashikant M. Comparison of surgical outcomes of tympanoplasty assisted by conventional microscopic method and endoscopic method. Int J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016;2(4):184-8.

Kumar M, Kanaujia SK, Singh A. Comparative study of endoscopic vs conventional myringoplasty. Int J Otorhinolaryngol Clin. 2015;7(3):132-7.

Raj A, Ravi M. Endoscopic transcanal myringoplasty- a study. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;53(1):47-9.

Yadav S P Aggarwal N, Julaha M, Goel A. Endoscope assisted myringoplasty Singapore med J. 2009;50(5):510-2.

Harugop AS, Mudhol RS, Godhi RA. A comparative study of endoscope assisted myringoplasty and micrsoscope assisted myringoplasty. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;60(4):298-302.

Dundar R, Kulduk E, Soy FK, Aslan M, Hanci D, Muluk NB, et al. Endoscopic versus microscopic approach to type 1 tympanoplasty in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;78(7):1084-9.

Coskun BU, Cinar U, Seven H, Ugur S, Dadas B. The effects of the incision types in myringoplasty operations on cosmesis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2006;263(9):820-2.

Furukawa T, Watanabe T, Ito T, Kubota T, Kakehata S. Feasibility and advantages of transcanal endoscopic myringoplasty. Otol Neurotol. 2014;35:140-5.

Ghaffar S, Ikram M, Zia S, Raza A. Incorporating the endoscope into mid-dle ear surgery. Ear Nose Throat J. 2006;85:593-6.

Jaimin P, Ranjan GA Yogesh G, Rahul, Jayman R, Pokhraj PS. Endoscopic tympanoplasty vs microscopic tympanoplasty in tubotympanic csom: a comparative study of 44 cases; International J Res Med Sc. 2015;3(8):1953-7.

Karhuketo TS, Ilomäki JH, Puhakka HJ. Tympanoscope-assisted myringoplasty. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2001;63(6):353-8.

Badr-El-Dine M. Value of ear endoscopy in cholesteatoma surgery. Otology & Neurotology. 2002;23:631-5.

Kakehata S, Futai K, Sasaki A, Shinkawa H. Endoscopic transtympanic tympanoplasty in the treatment of conductive hearing loss: early results. Otol Neurotol. 2006;27(1):14-9.

Muaaz T. Endoscopic transcanal middle ear surgery: Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010; 62(1):6-24.

Ayache S. Cartilaginous myringoplasty: the endoscopic transcanal procedure. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;270:853-60.

Fabinyi B, Klug C. A minimally invasive technique for endoscopic middle ear surgery. European Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 1997;254:S53-4.

Mohindra S, Panda NK. Ear surgery without microscope; is it possible. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;62:138-41.