DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/issn.2454-5929.ijohns20205646

Is elongated styloid process a potential forewarning for failure in oral submucous fibrosis management?

Shital Mayank Patel, Deval Shailesh Mehta, Taher Abbas Rupawala, Naiya Hitesh Shah, Sanjay Vinubhai Makwana, Kruna Kantibhai Bhimani

Abstract


Oral submucous fibrosis is a widespread, premalignant disorder causing severe difficulty in mastication and speech. With high rate of malignant conversion, it demands aggressive surgical therapy followed by mandatory long-term physiotherapy. An elongated styloid process, if present, could pose a strong hindrance to movement of mandible, leading to complete relapse of trismus in such cases. The purpose of this report is to elaborate on such co-existence in patients having oral submucous fibrosis using digital orthopantomogram. 3 patients suspected to have an elongated styloid process were referred to maxillofacial surgical unit and diagnosed with grade 4A oral submucous fibrosis. Digital orthopantomogram revealed elongated styloid process which was measured using the C. S. imaging software 7.0.3. Consequently, patients were operated by a team of maxillofacial surgeons and otolaryngologists to relieve trismus and tonsillo-styloidectomy respectively. The measured lengths of the styloid process on digital orthopantomogram were considered elongated, if exceeding the normal length of 30 mm. The measured lengths of the styloid process were found to be at 52.7 mm, 50.1 mm and 57 mm on the right side and 51 mm, 46.8 mm and 37 mm on left side respectively in our cases. These elongated styloid processes observed in all three cases of submucous fibrosis indicates that progressive fibrosis may exert significant influence on the ossification of styloid complex. Hence, a routine preoperative screening in all patients of oral submucous fibrosis is imminent to avoid postoperative failure, pain or discomfort to the patient owing to an elongated styloid process.   


Keywords


Orthopantomogram, Oral submucous fibrosis, Elongated styloid process, Trismus, Pain

Full Text:

PDF

References


Warnakulasuriya S, Tilakaratne WM, Kerr A. Oral Submucous Fibrosis. Springer In Contempor Oral Oncol. 2017:329-53.

Passi D, Bhanot P, Kacker D, Chahal D, Atri M, Panwar Y. Oral submucous fibrosis: Newer proposed classification with critical updates in pathogenesis and management strategies. Nation J Maxillofac Surg. 2017;8(2):89.

Tilakaratne WM, Ekanayaka RP, Warnakulasuriya S. Oral submucous fibrosis: a historical perspective and a review on etiology and pathogenesis. Oral Medic Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2016;122(2):178-91.

Kale S, Srivastava N, Bagga V, Shetty A. Effectiveness of long term supervised and assisted physiotherapy in postsurgery oral submucous fibrosis patients. Case Repo Dentist. 2016;2016.

Hebbar PB, Sheshaprasad R, Gurudath S, Pai A, Sujatha D. Oral submucous fibrosis in India: Are we progressing? Ind J Canc. 2014;51(3):222.

Khanna JN, Andrade NN. Oral submucous fibrosis: a new concept in surgical management: report of 100 cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1995;24:433-9.

More CB, Asrani MK. Evaluation of the styloid process on digital panoramic radiographs. Ind J Radiol Imag. 2010;20(4):261.

More CB, Das S, Patel H, Adalja C, Kamatchi V, Venkatesh R. Proposed clinical classification for oral submucous fibrosis. Oral Oncol. 2012;48(3):200-2.

Kalvizhi EB, Charanya D, Sasirekha B, Megalaa N, Kanmani R. A review on oral Submucous Fibrosis. Int J Curr Res. 2017;9(07):55116-20.

Reddy V, Wanjari PV, Banda NR, Reddy P. Oral submucous fibrosis: Correlation of clinical grading to various habit factors. Int J Dent Clinic. 2011;3(1).

Rajalalitha P, Vali S. Molecular pathogenesis of oral submucous fibrosis–a collagen metabolic disorder. J Oral Pathol Medicine. 2005;34(6):321-8.

Tilakaratne WM, Klinikowski MF, Saku T, Peters TJ, Warnakulasuriya S. Oral submucous fibrosis: review on aetiology and pathogenesis. Oral Oncol. 2006;42(6):561-8.

Shivakumar HR, Batra J, Upasi AP, Rai KK. Evaluation of elongated styloid process in patients with oral submucous fibrosis using panoramic radiographs. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2014;13(4):556-9.

Eagle WW. Elongated styloid processes: report of two cases. Arch Otolaryngol. 1937;25(5):584-7.

Kar IB, Mishra N, Raut S, Singh AK. Facial pain due to elongated styloid process. Contempor Clinic Dentist. 2013;4(2):248.

Bozkir MG, Boğa H, Dere F. The evaluation of elongated styloid process in panoramic radiographs in edentulous patients. Turk J Med Sci. 1999;29(4):481-6.

Eagle WW. Elongated styloid processes: report of two cases. Arch Otolaryngol. 1937;25(5):584-7.

Lambor DV, Shetgaunkar RR, De Sa C. Stylalgia: Our Experience of 101 Cases Treated by Intraoral Styloidectomy. Ind J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020:1-7.

Singhania AA, Chauhan NV, George A, Rathwala K. Lidocine Infiltration Test: An Useful Test in the Prediction of Results of Styloidectomy for Eagle’s Syndrome. Ind J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;65(1):20-3.

Steinmann EP. Styloid syndrome in absence of an elongated process. Acta oto-laryngologica. 1968;66(1-6):347-56.

Steinmann EP. A new light on the pathogenesis of the styloid syndrome. Arch Otolaryngol. 1970;91(2):171-4.

Keur JJ, Campbell JP, McCarthy JF, Ralph WJ. The clinical significance of the elongated styloid process. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1986;61(4):399-404.

Chickooree D, Ram V. Eagle’s Syndrome-View from the general practitioners perspective. Clin Med Diagn. 2014;4(19):9-13.

D'Angelo M, Sarment DP, Billings PC, Pacifici M. Activation of transforming growth factor β in chondrocytes undergoing endochondral ossification. J Bone Miner Res. 2001;16(12):2339-47.

Breault MR. Eagle's syndrome: review of the literature and implications in craniomandibular disorders. CRANIO®. 1986;4(4):323-37.

Moffat DA, Ramsden RT, Shaw HJ. The styloid process syndrome: aetiological factors and surgical management. J Laryngol Otol. 1977;91(4):279-94.

Kaufman SM, Elzay RP, Irish EF. Styloid process variation: radiologic and clinical study. Arch Otolaryngol. 1970;91(5):460-3.