DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/issn.2454-5929.ijohns20213893

Comparative study of outcomes of type 1 tympanoplasty with and without anterior tucking

Sonee Thingujam, Jayita Poduval

Abstract


Background: Type-1 tympanoplasty is the functional restoration of the normal middle ear by repairing the tympanic membrane (TM). Different techniques are still evolving to devise a way to give optimal graft uptake and hearing improvement with minimal instrumentation. Various studies have been done to assess the role of anterior tucking in type-1 tympanoplasty and to assess its superiority over other methods in repairing subtotal perforations and large perforations involving the anterior quadrant.

Methods: This study was done to compare the outcomes of endoscopic type-1 tympanoplasty with and without anterior tucking. 60 cases of chronic otitis media (COM) mucosal type were divided into 2 groups of 30 patients each. Group 1 underwent endoscopic type-1 tympanoplasty with anterior tucking and group 2 underwent endoscopic type-1 tympanoplasty without anterior tucking. The outcomes were evaluated after 6 months and compared in terms of graft uptake and hearing gain.

Results: The mean air-bone gap improvement was 13.16±2.65 in group 1 and 12.90±3.78 in group 2, which had statistically insignificant differences indicating similar hearing outcomes in both the groups. 96.7% successful graft uptake was achieved in group 1 and 90% in group 2, showing statistically insignificant differences indicating similar graft uptake rates in both the groups.

Conclusions: Anterior tucking with endoscopic type-1 tympanoplasty could provide good graft support and efficient hearing improvement but cannot be labelled as a mandatory step in repairing subtotal perforations or large perforations involving anterior quadrant as the outcomes are comparable to the endoscopic type-1 tympanoplasty done without anterior tucking. 


Keywords


Type-1 tympanoplasty, Anterior tucking, Chronic otitis media

Full Text:

PDF

References


Sinkkonen ST, Jero J, Aarnisalo AA. Tympanic membrane perforation. Duodecim. 2014;130(8):810-8.

Sarkar S. A review on the history of tympanoplasty. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;65(3):455-60.

Wullstein H. Theory and practice of tympanoplasty. Laryngoscope. 1956;66(8):1076-93.

Onal K, Uguz MZ, Kazikdas KC, Gursoy ST, Gokce H. A multivariate analysis of otological, surgical and patient-related factors in determining success in myringoplasty. Clin Otolaryngol. 2005;30(2):115-20.

Sharma SK, Kumar D, Singh R, Upadhyay VP, Dubey AK. Study of the etiological factors of failures of myringoplasty: a observational study. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;71(2):1562-6.

Darouassi Y, Aljalil A, Ennouali A, Hanine MA, Chebraoui Y, Bouaity B, et al. Prognostic factors of myringoplasty: study of a 140 cases series and review of the literature. Pan Afr Med J. 2019;33:323.

El-Guindy A. Endoscopic transcanalmyringoplasty. J Laryngol Otol. 1992;106(6):493-5.

Tarabichi M. Endoscopic middle ear surgery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1999;108(1):39-46.

Pap I, Tóth I, Gede N, Hegyi P, Szakács Z, Koukkoullis A, et al. Endoscopic type I tympanoplasty is as effective as microscopic type I tympanoplasty but less invasive-a meta-analysis. Clin Otolaryngol. 2019;44(6):942-53.

Jyothi AC, Shrikrishna BH, Kulkarni NH, Kumar A. Endoscopic myringoplasty versus microscopic myringoplasty in tubotympanic CSOM: a comparative study of 120 cases. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;69(3):357-62.

Harugop AS, Mudhol RS, Godhi RA. A comparative study of endoscope assisted myringoplasty and micrsoscope assisted myringoplasty. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;60(4):298-302.

Tseng CC, Lai MT, Wu CC, Yuan SP, Ding YF. Endoscopic transcanal myringoplasty for anterior perforations of the tympanic membrane. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016;142(11):1088-93.

Lakpathi G, Reddy LS, Anand. Comparative study of endoscope assisted myringoplasty and microscopic myringoplasty. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016;68(2):185-90.

Kaya I, Sezgin B, Sergin D, Ozturk A, Eraslan S, Gode S, et al. Endoscopic versus microscopic type 1 tympanoplasty in the same patients: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017;274(9):3343-9.

Mishra P, Sonkhya N, Mathur N. Prospective study of 100 cases of underlay tympanoplasty with superiorly based circumferential flap for subtotal perforations. Indian J Otolaryngology. 2007;59(3):225-8.

Gersdorff M, Garin P, Decat M, Juantegui M. Myringoplasty: long-term results in adults and children. Am J Otol. 1995;16(4):532-5.

Bhat NA, De R. Retrospective analysis of surgical outcome, symptom changes, and hearing improvement following myringoplasty. J Otolaryngol. 2000;29(4):229-32.

Sharp JF, Terzis TF, Robinson J. Myringoplasty for the anterior perforation: experience with the Kerr flap. J Laryngol Otol. 1992;106(1):14-6.

Primrose WJ, Kerr AG. The anterior marginal perforation. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1986;11(3):175-6.

Moras K, Lasarado S, Shivaraj R, Aramani A, Pinto G. 360 degree subannular tympanoplasty a retrospective study of 200 cases. J Evol Med Dent Sci. 2015;4:5455.

Hay A, Blanshard J. The anterior interlay myringoplasty: outcome and hearing results in anterior and subtotal tympanic membrane perforations. Otol Neurotol. 2014;35(9):1569-76.

Peng R, Lalwani AK. Efficacy of ‘‘hammock’’ tympanoplasty in the treatment of anterior perforations. Laryngoscope. 2013;123(5):1236-40.

Schraff S, Dash N, Strasnick B. "Window shade" tympanoplasty for anterior marginal perforations. Laryngoscope. 2005;115(9):1655-9.

Prakash MD, Abhilasha S. The role of anterior tucking of graft in subtotal perforation of tympanic membrane. Int J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018;4(3):759-63.

Dhanapala N, Hussain SM, Reddy LS, Bandadka R. Comparative study of clinical and audiological outcome between anterior tucking and circumferential flap methods of type I tympanoplasty in large central perforation. Indian J Otol. 2018;24(3):190-3.

Shanbag R, Arunkumar JS, Chand MS, Garag SS. Comparative study of anterior tucking and cartilage support tympanoplasty with respect to graft uptake and hearing outcome. Int J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;5(1):69-76.

Burse KS, Kulkarni SV, Bharadwaj CC, Shaikh S, Roy GS. Anterior tucking vs. cartilage support tympanoplasty. Odisha J Otorhinolaryngol HNS. 2014;8(2):18-20.

Bartel R, Levorato M, Adroher M, Cardelus S, Diaz A, Lacima J, et al. Transcanal endoscopic type 1 tympanoplasty in children: cartilage butterfly and fascia temporalis graft. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2019;121:120-2.

Lade H, Choudhary SR, Vashishth A. Endoscopic vs microscopic myringoplasty;a different prospective. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2014;271(7):1897-902.