DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/issn.2454-5929.ijohns20214823

A comparative study of endoscopic assisted versus conventional middle ear and mastoid surgery at a tertiary care teaching hospital

Jitendra Kumar Sharma, Sushma Mahich, Navneet Mathur

Abstract


Background: Objectives were to compare outcomes, intra operative visualization and operative time duration in endoscopic assisted vs conventional middle ear and mastoid surgery.

Methods: This prospective comparative study was conducted in 50 patients; among them 25 cases were of endoscope assisted middle ear surgery and 25 cases with conventional microscopic middle ear surgery. A 4 mm diameter, 18 cm long rigid, zero-degree endoscope and operating microscope was used. Primary outcomes include mean average pre and post operative air-bone (A-B) gap, hearing thresholds, intra operative visualization and duration of surgery.

Results: Mean A-B gap closure for endoscopic assisted tympanoplasty was 12.76±6.00 dB, while it was 8.38±5.78 dB for non-endoscopic assisted tympanoplasty. The results were comparative. Mean intra-operative time duration for endoscopic assisted tympanoplasty was 70.23±4.17 min, while it was 77±9.80 min for non-endoscopic assisted tympanoplasty with statically significant difference between both groups (p=0.03). Graft uptake rate for endoscopic assisted tympanoplasty was 92.31% while it was 84.62% for non-endoscopic assisted tympanoplasty. Residual cholesteatoma remnant on endoscopy was found in 43.66% cases out of 12 mastoidectomy cases performed via endoscopic assistance.

Conclusions: The endoscope can be successfully applied to ear surgery for most of the ear procedures with a reasonable success rate both in terms of perforation closure and hearing improvement and with minimal exposure. Wide-field zero, 30 or 70° endoscope sallow visualization of hidden anatomic spaces and working around corners i.e., epitympanum, hypotympanum and retro tympanum for safe removal of cholesteatoma.


Keywords


Air-bone gap, Cholesteatoma, Endoscopic, Tympanoplasty, Mastoidectomy

Full Text:

PDF

References


Tarabichi M, Nogueira JF, Marchioni D, Presutti L, Pothier DD. Transcanal Endoscopic Management of Cholesteatoma. Otolaryngol Clin N Am 2013;46:107-30.

Kanona H, Virk JS, Owa A. Endoscopic ear surgery: A case series and first United Kingdom experience. World J Clin Cases 2015;3(3):310-7.

Marchioni D, Alicandri-Ciufelli M, Molteni G, Genovese E, Presutti L. Endoscopic tympanoplasty in patients with attic retraction pockets. Laryngoscope. 2010;120:1847-55.

Sarkar S, Banerjee S, Chakravarty S, Singh R, Sikder B, Bera SP. Endoscopic stapes surgery: Our experience in thirty-two patients. Clin otolaryngol. 2013;38(2):157-60.

Kumar K, Thakur VK, Singh SP. A Comparative Study of Endoscopic and microscopic approach tympanoplasty for Simple Chronic Otitis Media. J Dental Med Sci. 2016;15(11):101-4.

Huang TY, Ho KY, Wang LF, Chien CY, Wang HM. A comparative study of endoscopic and microscopic approach type 1 tympanoplasty for simple chronic otitis media. J Int Adv Otol. 2016;12(1):28-31.

Kumar M, Kanaujia SK, Singh A. A comparative study of endoscopic myringoplasty v/s conventional myringoplasty. Int J Otolaryngol Clin. 2015;7(3):132-7.

Choi N, Noh Y, Park W, Lee JJ, Yook S, Choi JE et al. Comparison of Endoscopic Tympanoplasty to Microscopic Tympanoplasty. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2017;10(1):44-9.

Sajjadi H. Endoscopic middle ear and mastoid surgery for cholesteatoma. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;25(71):63-70.