A comparative study between conventional nasal packing versus nasal splint with clip after septoplasty with bilateral reduction of inferior turbinates with bipolar cautery

Authors

  • Santosh Uttarkar Pandurangarao Department of ENT, JJM Medical College, Davangere, Karnataka, India
  • Mallikarjunappa Ajjampura Murugendrappa Department of ENT, JJM Medical College, Davangere, Karnataka, India
  • Dheeraj Kumar Jonnalagadda Department of ENT, JJM Medical College, Davangere, Karnataka, India
  • Raga Panicker Department of ENT, JJM Medical College, Davangere, Karnataka, India
  • Sridurga Janarthanan Department of ENT, JJM Medical College, Davangere, Karnataka, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2454-5929.ijohns20181992

Keywords:

Nasal splints, Turbinates, Cautery, Septal correction, Septoplasty

Abstract

Background: Nasal packing is an important step after septal surgeries. Conventional nasal packing with vaseline gauze is associated with significant morbidity. Of late, the nasal splint with clip has been tried as an alternative in an attempt to prevent this morbidity. The aim of our study is to compare post-operative morbidities of conventional nasal packing (using vaseline gauze) and nasal splint with clip following septoplasty and cauterization of inferior turbinates.

Methods: A comparative study was conducted on 50 patients who underwent septoplasty surgery with reduction of both inferior turbinates using bipolar cautery. In the postoperative period, patients were assessed for pain, nasal obstruction, head ache and ear complaints.  

Results: Patients in whom nasal splint with clip were used, were found to have a more comfortable postoperative period when compared to conventional nasal packing, which was found to be statistically significant.

Conclusions: Post-operative morbidity has been found to be significantly lower with nasal splint with clip in comparison to conventional nasal packing using vaseline gauze.

Author Biographies

Santosh Uttarkar Pandurangarao, Department of ENT, JJM Medical College, Davangere, Karnataka, India

Department of ENT, Professor

Mallikarjunappa Ajjampura Murugendrappa, Department of ENT, JJM Medical College, Davangere, Karnataka, India

Department of ENT, Professor

Dheeraj Kumar Jonnalagadda, Department of ENT, JJM Medical College, Davangere, Karnataka, India

Department of ENT, post graduate

Raga Panicker, Department of ENT, JJM Medical College, Davangere, Karnataka, India

Department of ENT, post graduate

Sridurga Janarthanan, Department of ENT, JJM Medical College, Davangere, Karnataka, India

Department of ENT, post graduate

References

Veluswamy A, Handa S, Shivaswamy S. Nasal Septal Clips: An Alternative to Nasal Packing After Septal Surgery? Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;64(4):346-50.

Salinger S, Cohen DM. Surgery of the difficult septum. Arch Otolaryngol. 1955;61(4):419–21.

Goode RL. Magnetic intranasal splints. Arch Otolaryngol. 1982;108:319.

Nayak DR, Murty KD, Balakrishna R. Septal splint with wax plates. J Postgard Med. 1995;41(3):70–1.

Erkhan G, Ergin NT. Comparison of suture and nasal packing in rabbit noses. Laryngoscope. 2004;144:639–45.

Kurle G, Patil VS, Manjunath N. A comparative study between nasal clips and anterior nasal packing in septoplasty/submucosal resection patients at VIMS Bellary, Karnataka. Int J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;3(2):364-70.

Dutta S, Mukherjee A, Saha J, Biswas G, Haldar D, Sen I, et al. Modified Technique of Anterior Nasal Packing: A Comparative Study Report. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;64(4):341-5.

Schoenberg M, Robinson P, Ryan R. Nasal packing after routine nasal surgery—Is it justified? J Laryngol Otol. 1993;107:902–5.

Nunez DA, Martin FW. An evaluation of post-operative packing in nasal septal surgery. Clin Otolargyngol. 1991;16:549–50.

Downloads

Published

2018-06-23

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles